Sufficient Agreement and
Best Known Nonmatch
.38 Special with matching class characteristics,
nonmatching individual characteristics
Courtesy of Forensic Technology Inc.
The second of the three principles of the AFTE Theory of Identification indicates that the degree of correspondence which must be exceeded to constitute sufficient agreement for an identification is the best known non-match (by each individual examiner) to have been produced by different tools. Ideally, the examiner would gain experience in this during their initial training period rather than when they begin to perform actual examinations on their own.
The third principle of the AFTE Theory of Identification indicates that although founded on the scientific method and reproducibility of results, the interpretation is subjective in nature. As a quality measure, it is the policy of most laboratories that a second qualified examiner verify the scientific findings of the first examiner.
Ultimately, sufficient agreement is the product of the individual examiner’s training, skills, and experience in
- recognizing corresponding patterns of matching striations,
- recognizing corresponding patterns within impressed toolmarks,
- determining the best known non-match in their personal experience,
- comparing striated and impressed toolmarks.
It is incumbent on each examiner to rely on their training and experience to identify and to be able to articulate the process used to determine sufficient agreement and best known nonmatch.
< Previous Page :: Next Page >