Rating the Symposium and Sessions
General
1 - Poor |
1 |
0.61% |
2 |
3 |
1.84% |
3 - Satisfactory |
17 |
10.43% |
4 |
81 |
49.69% |
5 - Excellent |
61 |
37.42% |
Total |
163 |
|
1 - Poor |
0 |
0.00% |
2 |
1 |
0.62% |
3 - Satisfactory |
20 |
12.35% |
4 |
76 |
46.91% |
5 - Excellent |
65 |
40.12% |
Total |
162 |
|
1 - Poor |
1 |
0.62% |
2 |
9 |
5.56% |
3 - Satisfactory |
19 |
11.73% |
4 |
79 |
48.77% |
5 - Excellent |
54 |
33.33% |
Total |
162 |
|
Back to top.
Concurrent Sessions: Forensic Science Track
1 - Poor |
2 |
1.57% |
2 |
4 |
3.15% |
3 - Satisfactory |
18 |
14.17% |
4 |
57 |
44.88% |
5 - Excellent |
46 |
36.22% |
Total |
127 |
|
1 - Poor |
0 |
0.00% |
2 |
3 |
2.46% |
3 - Satisfactory |
16 |
13.11% |
4 |
50 |
40.98% |
5 - Excellent |
53 |
43.44% |
Total |
122 |
|
1 - Poor |
0 |
0.00% |
2 |
0 |
0.00% |
3 - Satisfactory |
19 |
19.00% |
4 |
40 |
40.00% |
5 - Excellent |
41 |
41.00% |
Total |
100 |
|
1 - Poor |
1 |
0.85% |
2 |
3 |
2.56% |
3 - Satisfactory |
21 |
17.95% |
4 |
53 |
45.30% |
5 - Excellent |
39 |
33.33% |
Total |
117 |
|
Back to top.
Effective Case Management Strategies Track
1 - Poor |
1 |
0.92% |
2 |
8 |
7.34% |
3 - Satisfactory |
22 |
20.18% |
4 |
49 |
44.95% |
5 - Excellent |
29 |
26.61% |
Total |
109 |
|
1 - Poor |
0 |
0.00% |
2 |
3 |
2.22% |
3 - Satisfactory |
13 |
9.63% |
4 |
52 |
38.52% |
5 - Excellent |
67 |
49.63% |
Total |
135 |
|
1 - Poor |
0 |
0.00% |
2 |
1 |
0.89% |
3 - Satisfactory |
25 |
22.32% |
4 |
50 |
44.64% |
5 - Excellent |
36 |
32.14% |
Total |
112 |
|
1 - Poor |
0 |
0.00% |
2 |
2 |
2.20% |
3 - Satisfactory |
18 |
19.78% |
4 |
41 |
45.05% |
5 - Excellent |
30 |
32.97% |
Total |
91 |
|
Back to top.
Investigative Strategies and Techniques Track
1 - Poor |
5 |
3.62% |
2 |
16 |
11.59% |
3 - Satisfactory |
30 |
21.74% |
4 |
45 |
32.61% |
5 - Excellent |
42 |
30.43% |
Total |
138 |
|
1 - Poor |
0 |
0.00% |
2 |
7 |
6.93% |
3 - Satisfactory |
27 |
26.73% |
4 |
38 |
37.62% |
5 - Excellent |
29 |
28.71% |
Total |
101 |
|
1 - Poor |
2 |
2.08% |
2 |
5 |
5.21% |
3 - Satisfactory |
21 |
21.88% |
4 |
43 |
44.79% |
5 - Excellent |
25 |
26.04% |
Total |
96 |
|
1 - Poor |
0 |
0.00% |
2 |
7 |
9.72% |
3 - Satisfactory |
20 |
27.78% |
4 |
26 |
36.11% |
5 - Excellent |
19 |
26.39% |
Total |
72 |
|
1 - Poor |
0 |
0.00% |
2 |
2 |
3.13% |
3 - Satisfactory |
19 |
29.69% |
4 |
23 |
35.94% |
5 - Excellent |
20 |
31.25% |
Total |
64 |
|
1 - Poor |
0 |
0.00% |
2 |
2 |
2.86% |
3 - Satisfactory |
20 |
28.57% |
4 |
29 |
41.43% |
5 - Excellent |
19 |
27.14% |
Total |
70 |
|
Back to top.
Plenary Sessions
1 - Poor |
0 |
0.00% |
2 |
2 |
1.23% |
3 - Satisfactory |
24 |
14.72% |
4 |
69 |
42.33% |
5 - Excellent |
68 |
41.72% |
Total |
163 |
|
1 - Poor |
1 |
0.61% |
2 |
5 |
3.07% |
3 - Satisfactory |
40 |
24.54% |
4 |
62 |
38.04% |
5 - Excellent |
55 |
33.74% |
Total |
163 |
|
1 - Poor |
6 |
3.73% |
2 |
9 |
5.59% |
3 - Satisfactory |
29 |
18.01% |
4 |
49 |
30.43% |
5 - Excellent |
68 |
42.24% |
Total |
161 |
|
Back to top.